FXCC established itself as an ECN/STP broker, offering traders the core MT4 trading platform, including the MAM module for asset management services. It has one account type for all clients without minimum deposit requirements and maximum leverage of 1:500. Beginner traders get a basic introduction to trading and quality research and trading signals.
XM caters to 5M+ traders from 190 countries. It offers traders the MT4/MT5 trading platforms, high leverage, low minimum deposits, and a well-balanced asset selection. The educational and research portfolio remains at the top of its class, and the XM execution environment, with 2.4 billion trades executed without requotes or rejections, is ideal for demanding traders.
I have conducted an in-depth review of FXCC and XM to determine which one presents the better overall choice and which traders will benefit the most at either broker.
- Features and Platforms
- Available Markets
- Typical Spreads and Fees
- Security and Trust
- FXCC versus XM - Verdict
Cyprus Cyprus ASIC, CySEC, DFSA, FSC Belize CySEC, VFSC N/A N/A 2009 2010 Market Maker ECN/STP, No Dealing Desk $5 $50 MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, Proprietary platform MetaTrader 4 0.1 pips N/A 0.2 pips N/A $0.05 N/A $0.19 N/A Visit Website Visit Website
Features and Platforms
N/A N/A Visit Website Visit Website
Noteworthy:
FXCC and XM share a similar core trading environment, supportive of algorithmic trading solutions. Both offer high leverage, excellent order execution, and generous bonuses, but FXCC maintains a minor edge in trading costs.
Available Markets
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Visit Website Visit Website
Forex traders get a broader choice of currency pairs at FXCC versus XM, with 71 against 57, while XM lists more cryptocurrencies, with eight against 31, following XM’s recent expansion. The most notable difference between the offerings of FXCC and XM is equity trading, which FXCC does not offer. Both serve their core markets competitively.
Typical Spreads and Fees
0.1 pips N/A 0.2 pips N/A $0.05 N/A $0.19 N/A Visit Website Visit Website
FXCC maintains an industry-leading pricing environment, offering traders commission-free access to raw spreads of 0 pips but average costs of 0.5 pips. XM has commission-free trading costs with a minimum mark-up of 0.6 pips. FXCC lists no additional costs except bank wire charges, while XM applies a $5 monthly inactivity fee after 90 days.
Security and Trust
United Arab Emirates, Australia, The Bahamas, Belize, Cyprus, United Kingdom, United States N/A ASIC, CySEC, DFSA, FSC Belize CySEC, VFSC 705428, 120/10, 443670, 000261/397, F003484, SIA-F201, 0516820 N/A 1,1,1,4,2,4,1 N/A Visit Website Visit Website
FXCC and XM segregate client deposits, offer negative balance protection, and are trustworthy brokers. All non-EEA FXCC traders will deal with the unregulated but duly registered Vanuatu subsidiary, registration number 14576. The UK and Cyprus subsidiaries also offer an investor compensation fund.
XM vs FXCC – Verdict
FXCC
| Pros | Cons |
| Commission-free raw spreads from 0 pips with average cost of 0.5 pips | Equity trading not available |
| One account type with no minimum deposits and high leverage | |
| Quality education for beginner traders and daily trading signals | |
| Full support for algorithmic and social |
XM
| Pros | Cons |
| Well balanced overall asset selection | Limited cryptocurrency selection |
| Upgraded MT4/MT5 trading accounts with excellent order execution statistics | |
| Low minimum deposit of $5 and maximum leverage of 1:888 | |
| Competitive commission-free trading costs from $5.00 per 1 standard lot |
XM has the edge in asset selection. It presents a compelling choice for DMA equity investors and maintains competitive trading conditions. However, FXCC offers Forex traders a better overall trading environment with a broader choice of currency pairs and lower trading costs, making it ideal for scalpers and other high-frequency trading strategies.
You might also be interested in reviewing the below broker comparisons:
